epicureanism vs christianity

inevitably one faces the question, am I deserving of love? After sensation, we interpret and distort, moving us further and further away from original reality. My only hope was to believe in Jesus and follow whatever the Bible says, or else be guilty of disobeying God. Well i came to love myself not because I sore in myself necessarily something lovable, but because God is love and loves the unlovable. Epicureanism: the ancient philosophy that won't go away After his death, Epicureanism was a major philosophy until the rise of Christianity. Christianitys ability to ground human value depends on its truthfulness, but Christianity has no more burden of proof than Epicurean materialism does. Many people have lost sight of the fact that they are living a life of their own, free from outside influences and expectations. First, Christianity is founded on Jesus of Nazareths dolorous death. Finally, university research into near death and after death experiences suggest that consciousness is more than brain function. This is a totally immoral and depraved doctrine. The consequences, however, are the same: in the end, the Epicurean is forced to live with the same temperance and justice as the Stoic. Maybe they were ill-tempered, or even violent. Christians are forever apologising for themselves, even as they know full well they are trying to live to an impossible standard. It is therefore not judicious for him to murder. What arguments have been used to counter the Epicurean Paradox? As I said before, Christianity is fundamentally about the death and resurrection of Jesus. Most modern scholars dismiss the depiction of the early Vikings as pagans who hated Christians. There are plenty of things in life that are out of our hands and so it is impossible for us to rely on someone else in order to make it through the week or month. Kinetic pleasure. why was I being mocked by my peers, what is this word; gay that they chant at me in cruel tones? In the end, its all about just trying to make the most of what life gives us and helping others as much as we can. The philosophy of Epicurus (341-270 B.C.E.) Epicurus | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy I used creative commons (links below) and licensed material from St. However, despite this popular conclusion, Christianity was too deeply rooted as the Roman Empires official religion for it to be supplanted. Benjamin D. Wiker |. Out of the three Abrahamic monotheisms, Judaism is perhaps the most unique. This is a wonderful and heartfelt critique of Christianity. Most of the world's monotheistic religions (e.g., Islam, Judaism, Christianity) describe their gods as having the four attributes described above. The stoic does not care what happens after he dies. We should always remember that while there is going to be a lot of pain and suffering in life, there is also going to be joy and happiness. The possibility that he might be killed by one of his victims heightens his pleasure because he enjoys risk-taking. For I reflected on this word, I enquired what it meant. The struggle in faith is this and this alone, if I am lacking and in need, do I believe God is able to help me? Where do you think Christianity and Epicureanism agree, if at all Both philosophies regard a happy life as the end goal. Some Christians would claim that Christianity, or at the very least formalised religion, is a pre-requisite for living a truly moral life, though that isnt a view held by all. Youre trying to open your mind to other ways of thought as perhaps the Evangelical church nailed it into you too hard. Also I have come to the conclusion that hell is a Experience of Many people are under the false impression that there is more to life than what is right in front of them. Although Epicureanism has much that is morally worthwhile, philosophically it suffers a decisive weakness which is exposed by these questions: who is to tell us what is pleasurable and who is tell us that we are to choose our pleasures judiciously? This view does not entail necessarily the cosmic panorama of post-mortem existence of Christianity, but it is the beginning of a move towards the proposition that we remain conscious after death as described by Jesus in his parable of Lazarus and the beggar (Luke 16:19-31). Epicurus was an atomic materialist, following in the steps of Democritus. The Book of Proverbs is filled with advice and admonitions about the importance of being wise and discrete. Like it or not, were all going to die sooner or later. My theme in this chapter is the presence of . Such must occur of necessity: Since Grace builds on Nature, a Christian who adopts a view of Nature completely at odds with Christian Revelation thereby blinds himself to some of that Revelation. It sounds like that Evangelical church put some certain ideas into your head or perhaps you just misunderstand. On a metaphysical level, Epicureanism and Christianity fundamentally contravene each other. Is pursuing virtue worth the trouble of trying to control what you can and accepting the rest? But of all things let us beware of disappointing ourselves.. A late Christian friend of mine spends her life looking after children, volunteering to help the elderly, and participating in the church choir and band. The first confrontation I had on my Spiritual journey, was being faced with my own lack of goodness. According to one ancient author: the chief good is a rational life, and the chief evil is death. Stoicism Vs. Epicureanism - Daily Stoic Taking vacations with reliable travel companies and looking after our teeth are judicious choices for, they are a secure way of gaining pleasure and an easy way of avoiding pain. Even at A level, my mum was sceptical of me taking a philosophy course because it may cause me to turn away from God. The possession of inward, spiritual rectitude. The stoic has many friends, the Epicurean has none. Paul Elmer More comments aptly: "Gregory's apology might seem almost to be a sermon on the Epicurean text 'Live concealed,' which no doubt he had heard discussed from every point of view during his student days at the university of Athens. Your email address will not be published. Others said, "He seems to be advocating foreign deities," because he preached Jesus and the resurrection. There is Scriptural warrant for agreeing that the great majority of people condemn murder as wrong for Romans 2:14, 15 states that generally people, whether they know God or not, have a conscience. Stoics used some of the same terminology as Christians. Jesus would rather consort with tax collectors (major thieves of the day) and prostitutes than with the religious elite. So as I was taught in school of God, so I believed. The present volume is the fruit of a conference in Copenhagen in 2014. At 19, he went to Athens to study at the Academy. Epicurus (341-271 B.C.) . Epicurus (c. 341-271 BC) was a Greek philosopher who believed that our ultimate truths come from what we experience, not what we think. Nor should we set our hearts on anything, for how seldom we can win our desires! Dont let fear rule your life. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. What else does Wood find attractive in Epicureanism? Founded around 307 BC, the philosophy emerged originally as a challenge to Platonism. But even after confession, Christians strive to improve to what are unrealistic standards, that ought never to be said if people are to live truly fulfilling lives. Its about being aware of yourself, your surroundings, and your moods. What Christianity offers to those who cling to Jesus as his or her sins atoning sacrifice is not personal extinction of all and the universes heat death, but an everlasting enjoyment of relationship with God and his people. Why Christianity, not Epicureanism, is the philosophy we need now It seemed, though, that he liked the philosophy of Democritus better. Christianity, on the other hand, presents humans as intrinsically valuable because humans are made in the image of God (Genesis 1:26), a maximal being who possesses maximum value. Our editors will review what youve submitted and determine whether to revise the article. The number of works produced by Epicurus and his disciples reveals an impressive theoretical activity. So a stoic will study what they can control, and then focus on what happens in their life. This is not a promise for the future. As the contemporary Epicurean is an atheist and post-Darwin, she is committed to the theories of evolution and natural selection as the origins of humanity. I wont get into any obscure verses in the Old Testament; the Christian community is divided as to how to interpret those verses and their relevance for the modern day- a debate that ought to be resolved amongst Christians. When the Visigoths sacked Rome in 410 AD, the Romans asked themselves what they had done wrong to cause this great humiliation. Epicurus leaves only 3 possibilities. How do you know, Read More What is The Difference Between Leadership and Motivation?Continue, Atomic Habit Quotes Be inspired to change with James Clear, The Science of Manifestation: How and why it works, How To Stop Relying on One Person for Happiness (13 Ways to Independence), Mindset vs Mindfulness: What is the difference. Were Jesus Disciples a Bunch of Hoaxers? Nevertheless, Christianity is no less concerned with this present lifes quality. Her answer to that question is that we are taught to be ambitious for wealth, power, and fame at the cost of our enjoyment and often at the cost of our health and relationships with others. Such philanthropy is hard to explain if the present is of no consequence. Epicurean atomism was remarkably similar to nineteenth-century atomic chemistry: atoms as indivisible, eternal building blocks, things as mere accumulations of atoms colliding with each other. Epicureanism and Christianity N. W. Dewitt Published 1 July 2015 History University of Toronto Quarterly It has long been a fixed belief in the cultural tradition of western Europe that of the ancient moralities it is Stoicism that exhibits the closest affinity with Christianity. To resolve the fear of extinction, there are two arguments within Epicurean literature. Epicureans believe that pleasure (and not wisdom) is the most important thing in life. He also is the creator of the course in the history of Christianity for Lucent University and organises apologetics conferences at his local church. For example, stoics believe they can find peace and happiness by relying on their inner self. When life throws at us a difficult situation that we cannot control, we should not give in to stress. The full theological and existential implications of this history-dividing event of everlasting consequences are still being understood. Instead, the stoics tell us to accept the situation as it is and do our best with what is in our control at the time. As the living are not dead, they cannot experience death either. Life was intended to be satisfying for Adam and Eve. Christianity, on the other hand, presents humans as intrinsically valuable because humans are made in the image of God (Genesis 1:26), a maximal being who possesses maximum value. Perhaps they lived lives deemed to be sexually promiscuous by society, and so feel inadequate due to a new sense of shame. Gain knowledge, be better, etc. 2 And given the continuing vitality of utilitarianism since that time, Epicurus can still be regarded as the theory's hoariest forerunner. . All of the above is conditional upon Christianity being true, of course, but the arguments for Christianity are arguments for another time and one which I should heartily recommend the unbelieving reader to investigate. What Do Epicureans Believe? Equally, the Islamic Society at Exeter University raises a lot of money for charity. So how do you break free from the dependence on, Read More How To Stop Relying on One Person for Happiness (13 Ways to Independence)Continue, The difference between a mindset vs mindfulness is in the why. Love God and your neighbour as yourself. We should rely on ourselves and make the most of what we have to achieve our goals in life. This article: one-two paragraphs of comparing epicurean ethics to Christianity, then just a huge bash to Christianity as a whole. Both philosophies champion the pursuit of knowledge, though they also both stress the importance of being self-sufficient and loving oneself before others. It's titeled "You will not taste death: Jesus and Epicureanism" by Jack W. Hannah.